The Problem in Florida
Florida is experiencing a gradually unfolding quandary in consequence of booming population development and growth in a context of limiting resources. Florida’s population is projected to extend by 72 p.c to 27.5 million over the following 25 years, and double in 50 years. Urban development, suburban stretch, transport pressures, coastal densities, habitat fragmentation, and reduced rural lands will be the inescapable result of this population increase unless expansion is managed cleverly. Existing conservation and preservation lands are under increasingly extreme pressure, and lands that ought to be protected will be lost to development unless they’re identified and protected in some specific form shortly. The idealist state programs of Florida Forever and Preservation 2k have saved over 2,000,000 acres, but we must act now to finish the task before the possibility is forever lost.
In March 2006, Gov. Bush delivered the keynote speech at the Florida Symposium on Methods for Regional Cooperation in which he emphasized the linkage between Florida’s environment and its economy saying, “We are liable to murdering the goose that lays the golden eggs.” By this he meant the now colorful economy of the state is critically reliant upon Florida’s storied, sun-washed standard of life and its natural environment, now staggering from multiple attacks.
The restrictions on land use are made ever more vital by the unfolding effects of global warming, which are expected to raise sea level twelve inches by 2075. Gurus also envision an enlarging likelihood of more heightened hurricanes striking the Florida coasts where eighty % of the populace lives. This confluence of inhibitions makes the identifying of statewide expansion management concerns critically critical. To defer or avoid such planning will end in irretrievable losses of resources and noticeably increased costs in the future when the options will be dreadful and the trade offs more economically costly.
Florida Needs Sustainable Development
The Agenda twenty-one Program of the U. N outlines supportable development as development that “meets the wants of the present generation without jeopardizing the capability of generations yet to come to meet their needs.” This echoes the 7th generation philosophy of the Iroquois, whereby chiefs were accountable for the effect of their actions on their descendants for 7 generations.
Supportability is the results of the movement of energy thru natural, social, and industrial systems. So , the 2002 World Conference on Supportable Development identified 3 goals for supportable development : ( – defending naturally occurring resources, ( – erasing misery, and ( – changing unsustainable production and consumption patterns.
Without regard for the way the term is outlined, the puzzle implicit in viable development is that the goals of supportability are interdependent. Indeed, the complex interlinking of the environmental, social, and commercial legs of supportability is clear from even an informal consideration of any one of the points related to expansion management in Florida. As an example, straightforward solutions for maximizing the near-term expansion of the nation’s economy would indisputably result in negative results for the natural environment and noticeably corrode the standard of life for its residents.
In the end we must at least maintain the life supporting system offered by the natural part if we are to have any hope of achieving a tolerable society and economy. The current situation isn’t new, and way back to the early 1800’s the history of Florida has been identified by regular land speculating. What’s different about our unfolding difficulty is the high level of agreement among policy makers, developers, land bosses, and conservationists that a limit to development is quickly being approached, beyond that the nation’s economy and resources will suffer most likely hopeless damages.
The Image shows the projected home expansion of the state by 2020 in which two to 3,000,000 acres of aquifer recharge lands will be developed ( conjectured by the Florida Chapter of The Nature Conservancy ). It’s very clear that this vision of the future isn’t consistent with the goals of supportable development. Most would accept that it’s time for a different vision of Florida.